Do mortgage originators
consider the future when they are speaking with a client and processing
the
loan? Perhaps: certainly between 2002 and 2007 originators
“appeared”
willing to lend to anyone since values were increasing, and any
problems might
be covered up with appreciation. They weren’t necessarily forcing
the
borrower to borrow, and investors weren’t being forced to buy the
mortgage-backed securities. Low priced homes appreciated more quickly
than high
priced loans, some believe because subprime lenders were more active in
that
segment. (After 2006, the prices of low-price homes have fallen faster
than
high-price homes.) Construction of new homes and apartments rose from
4.2% of
GDP in 1997 to 6.3% in 2005, but has since fallen to around 3%. And
while we’re
comparing GDP with housing, between 2001 and 2005 spending on housing
increased
by over 30% while GDP growth was about 11%.
Yesterday’s 2-yr auction ($42
billion at 1.11%) was the talk of the town, in spite of generally being
considered an average auction, or perhaps a little better. Indirect
bidding,
with all of its questionable worth but still used as a gauge of
non-dealer
customer demand, was good at almost 50%. Most believe that today’s 5-yr
auction, and tomorrow’s 7-yr auction, will be a better thermometer of
general
demand for debt.
But in addition to a
decent auction we had the S&P Case-Shiller US Home Price Index
“only”
down 14.9% versus a year ago. Fifteen out of twenty metropolitan
areas posted price
declines of more than 10% from a year earlier, and according
to the index many areas are back to 2003 price levels. (The basic
index
uses a benchmark set in January 2000 of 100.) There were some areas
that
improved from the month prior: Cleveland (+4.2%) and San Francisco
(+3.8%). For
the last year, both Las Vegas and Phoenix were down over 31%. To
balance that
news out, Consumer Confidence saw its first gain in three months,
coming
in better than expected at 54.1. (Rock-bottom was in February at 25.3.)
Last week mortgage
applications were up 7.5% versus the week before, according to the MBAA.
Refi’s were up almost 13% whereas purchases were up 1%. It is nice to
see that
purchase applications were up for the fourth month in a row. In fact,
compared
to the same week in 2008 apps are up over 34%. That being said, some
brokers
feel that things are relatively slow and going to get slower because of
HVCC
which threaten the applications actually closing.
Today, as I mentioned, we
have the $39 billion 5-yr auction. We also have Durable Goods and New
Home Sales. The New
Home numbers come out a little later, but Durable Goods (items that
last longer
than 3 years, like my son’s toothbrush) rose more than expected in
July. In fact,
at +4.9%, it was the biggest gain in two
years. It is indeed a volatile number, however, and in July Durable
Goods
were actually down 1.3%. Versus a year ago new orders are down almost
26%.
After the news we find 30-yr mortgage prices better by about .125
and the
yield on the 10-yr Treasury down to 3.43%.
CitiMortgage, effective Monday, has
discontinued their “Star Performance Tiered Fees Program”, and instead
moved to
fixed fees: the conventional pre-purchase review fee will be $120 and
the
government loan transfer fee will be $230. Citi also told clients that,
with
regard to their “Best Efforts Pull-Through Rewards/Fees Program”,
during the month
of September clients will not be receiving any rewards nor are they
subject to
any fees and will be given the time to focus on client’s pull-through.
PMI
told clients that lenders
will now be able to electronically submit all loans for their
“PMI-to-PMI
Refinance-to-Modification” programs. These programs focus on
refinancing existing
PMI-insured loans to allow “the same lender/servicer to refinance via
HARP for
GSE-owned loans as well as refinance-to-modification for loans owned by
other
investors and portfolio lenders and a new lender/servicer to refinance
via HARP
for GSE-owned loans as well as refinance-to-modification for loans
owned by
other investors.”
What has Wells Fargo's wholesale group been up to? They
recently told
clients that “all parties (including POAs) who sign the mortgage / deed
of trust
must sign and date the final HUD-1 Settlement Statement” – buyers,
sellers, and
the settlement agent. “If the buyer and the seller sign different
HUD-1s, the
cost and fees must be the same (with the exception of minor fees, such
as per
diem interest)” warned Wells.
I was confused when I
heard the word "service" used with these agencies:
Internal Revenue “Service”.
U.S. Postal “Service”.
Civil “Service”.
State, City, County & Public “Service”.
This is not what I thought “service” meant. But yesterday I overheard
two farmers talking, and one of them said he had hired a bull to
“service” a
few cows. BAM!!! It all came into focus. Now I understand what
all those agencies are doing to us.
Rob
(For
archived commentaries, check www.robchrisman.com,
or to
subscribe/unsubscibe write to rchrisman@robchrisman.com. The commentary
is produced every business day, but there always seem to be vague
e-mail
“issues”, so if you don’t receive it, let me know.)