|
Aug. 19, 2011: Troubling trends in existing home sales; bank job cuts; Remember Libor - why is it so low? Companies trying to process locks
Rob Chrisman
Every
month we hear about existing
home sales, with the usual quote from someone at the NAR.
(This time around, Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, said,
"Affordability conditions this year have been the most favorable
on record dating back to 1970, but many buyers are being held
back because banks are offering financing to only the most
highly qualified borrowers, ignoring a large share of otherwise
creditworthy buyers. Those potential buyers represent the
difference between an uneven recovery and a much more robust
housing market that could stimulate additional economic activity
and create jobs." Many in
the credit & mortgage industry would say that “qualified”
and “creditworthy” are subjective, and that NAR members rarely
underwrite loans and are better at helping to buy & sell
properties.)
Existing
home
sales fell 3.5% to 4.67 million in July, below expectations for
a modest gain. At this sales pace, it would take 9.4 months to
clear the inventory on the market for sale, almost double the
supply in a normal market. Economists believe that
this large imbalance between demand and supply likely will
keep downward pressure on home prices and housing
construction. Cancellations have increased, as suggested
by the widening gap between closed (existing) and signed
(pending) contracts. Per NAR, 16% of contracts failed because of
mortgage application rejections, 9% due to low appraisals. (Low
appraisals led to 13% of contracts being renegotiated below the
agreed upon price.) All-cash sales accounted for 29% of sales in
July, unchanged from June but down slightly from 30% last July,
and distressed sales made up 29% of sales compared with 30% in
June and 32% last July. The majority of distressed properties
are purchased without financing, usually by investors. A decline
in investor demand would be a clear negative for the housing
market given the large overhang of foreclosures that need to be
sold. If investor demand
is drying up it means prices would have to fall further to
clear the excess supply.
RE/MAX
released
a survey of 53 cities, showing that July home sales dropped
12.7% from the previous month. RE/MAX blamed tightened lending
standards, concern about the overall economy and bad appraisals
that reportedly killed many transactions. In addition, RE/MAX
also said many lenders are already using the lower loan limits
for government guaranteed or insured mortgages set to take
effect in October.
No
one wants to be the target of a probe, no pun intended. There is
some momentum picking up with regard to examining the rating agencies' role
in the mortgage meltdown - and many say "it is about time." http://uk.reuters.com/article/2011/08/18/uk-mortgage-probe-levin-idUKTRE77H5ZJ20110818.
Bank
of America
is cutting 3,500 jobs this quarter (they started the year with
280,000 employees). According to Reuters, global banks have
announced close to 50,000 job cuts, starting now and continuing
in coming years. HSBC
and Lloyds Banking Group have announced the biggest cuts,
and Bank of New York
Mellon Corp last week said it plans to cut about 1,500
jobs, or 3 percent of its workforce, due to rising expenses.
(In
a rare move, the FDIC shut down a bank on a Thursday. The
deposit base of Public Savings Bank of Pennsylvania was taken
over Capital Bank of
Rockville, Maryland.)
All
of the major US banks are seeing an influx of deposits, and
balance sheets are expanding at a very high rate. This is not
necessarily a good thing, however. At first it
sounds like a good problem to have, but in many ways it isn’t.
Remember that deposits are liabilities (not assets!) and cost
banks money. Meanwhile, over on the asset side, the tepid loan
environment means there aren’t many good places to lend the
influx of deposits!
In this era of low mortgage rates, few borrowers are opting for
ARM loans. We all know that at some point that will change and
lenders will all have to dust off their ARM margin notes and
remember things like LIBOR, created in the 1980's. The London Interbank
Offered Rate is a key adjustable rate mortgage index, but
also helps price trillions of dollars of derivatives and
corporate loans. Calculated daily, Libor (not all in caps) is
supposed to measure borrowing costs for a panel of banks
globally. The rate "floats," or ebbs and flows depending on how
much banks charge one another. At the height of the financial
crisis in 2008, Libor was one of the most-watched indicators, as
nervous investors looked at its sharp rise as a sign of waning
confidence in the stability of the global financial system.
These days, however, two key Libor gauges are being suppressed
because of sharply shrinking demand since banks have a lot of
cash, and don't need to borrow from each other. Libor rates are
very low, and have failed to reflect turmoil in the bank markets
amid the European debt crisis. (In the 2008 financial crisis, by
contrast, the rate rose to about 4.82% from 2.81% in a six-week
period.)
For consumers and companies, low Libor is good news because some
home, student and corporate loans, among other things, are
tethered to Libor. Just think of all those resetting ARM loans
(although the impact depends on margins). Most U.S. auto and
credit-card loans are set against the prime rate, however, which
now stands at 3.25% and often have margins in the teens.
The British Bankers' Association "oversees" Libor, and has some
reasons why Libor is so low and why banks are borrowing less
from one another in the Libor market. In the U.S. and Europe,
regulators have given banks cheap access to their lending
facilities since the 2008 panic. And depositors are parking
their money in banks - who needs to borrow outside aside from
banks with end-of-month funding needs? Retail deposits are
desirable because they are stable. The Fed has a lot of cash
now (which they could use to buy bonds) which also keeps Libor
low: there is a massive liquidity cushion.
Every mortgage company suddenly is swamped. Frank Fiore with Matchbox LLC writes,
"The joy of a bolstered pipeline faded with the prospect of not
being able to close it as operation inefficiencies suddenly came
to the forefront. Mortgage bankers are now worried about their
processes and looking for ways to handle the mounting surge." At
Plaza Mortgage, they
warned clients, "Due to heavy volume, you may experience delays
in processing document uploads through PULSE. Please avoid
duplicate uploads as this will further delay processing. Please
ensure the following documents are included in your submission
package for disclosures: 1. Initial 1003 with complete HMDA and
NMLS data, 2. Initial GFE, provided to borrowers w/in 3 days of
application, 3. Any subsequent revised GFE(s), if applicable, 4.
Initial Fees Worksheet/Itemization of Fees Breakdown, 5. Credit
Report."
Mortgage
companies
have been deluged with locks over the last few weeks - whether
or not they close remains to be seen. Out in Northern
California, a rep for Interbank
sent out a preemptive e-mail to his region. "From: Gabe Munoz at
gmunoz@interbankwholesale.com,
Subject: INTERBANK ***Northern CA $100 Million in Locks Not yet
Submitted**. I know a lot of you have locked a great many loans
since last Monday and the first of the month. Currently we have
100 million in the Bay Area alone that have yet to be submitted,
please get these in as soon as you can! At InterBank we require
a Pull Through on Locks and Underwriting approvals to stay above
75% and they have zero tolerance on this policy. Please remember
if your file is not submitted in the first 10 days from your
lock date, it will be cancelled, and you will not be allowed to
relock until we have received a complete file submission and you
will be subject to worse case pricing...Also if on you already
locked loans you would like to float down your rate a .25, again
please contact the lock desk and “cc” me with the borrower name
and loan # and what you would like to float down to, remember
it’s a .50 cost up front to float down on current day pricing."
Wow - what wholesale rep wouldn't want $100 million in business
for a month!? Good luck.
What
do these headlines add up to? "Consumer Price Index increased
0.5% in July," "Jobless claims climbed by 9,000 to 408,000, the
highest in a month," "Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia’s
general economic index unexpectedly plunged to minus 30.7 this
month, the lowest since March 2009," and "Treasury Yields Tumble
Amid Concern Worldwide Economic Growth Is Slowing." Stagflation?
Double-dip recession?
For
trading,
MBS volume was about average yesterday – nearly 20% of it being
15-yr paper. 10-year notes surged .75 in price down to 2.08% in
yield by the end of the day (1.99% intra-day) – but MBS prices
were nearly unchanged! (That is called “negative convexity”!)
Selling from mortgage bankers weighed on 3.5s and 4s as did the
prospect of looming supply, particularly from the increasing pay
downs that will be coming off the government (Fed/GSEs/Treasury)
MBS portfolios due to refinancings.
Yesterday
was
a very good example of how mortgage rates don't
always move in lock-step with rates on Treasury securities,
like the 10-yr note. This commentary usually quotes the yield on
the 10-yr in comparison to where it was the previous day, as a
rough rule of thumb. But yesterday the 10-yr sank to a yield of
1.98%, up over .75 in price, while current coupon MBS prices
were nearly unchanged! Hedgers beware!
This
morning,
out of the gate, stocks are going to get smeared again while
rates are…not much different. As one trader put it, “equities
are finally getting the joke that bonds have been telling for a
while now.” There is no scheduled news until Tuesday, leaving us
open to “headline news”. The 10-yr sits at 2.10%, and MBS prices are worse by
about .125.
A woman is sitting at home on the veranda with her husband and
she says, "I Love You."
He asks, "Is that you or the wine talking?"
She replies, "It's me.........talking TO the wine."
If
you're
interested, visit my twice-a-month blog at the STRATMOR Group
web site located at
|