On
the interesting side, per the FDIC, there were no new banks
created in the U.S. in 2011, making it the first year
since at least 1984 that the country has gone without the
establishment of a single start-up lender. The Financial Times
reports that none of the three new banking charters reported by
the US FDIC for 2011 were de novos. That is compared with three
de novo banks reported in 2010. (A de novo bank is a freshly
chartered bank that has not been created through the takeover of
an existing institution.)
On
the minus side of things, "Valued Customers, Aurora Bank has made the
decision to close its Residential Lending unit which
includes its Correspondent Lending business. Aurora Bank
continues to service its current mortgage customers. We are no
longer accepting new loan registrations or locks. We are
committed to processing locked applications in the pipeline
through to final disposition. Please note that lock extensions
will not be granted. We will continue to be staffed to support
your needs and ensure a seamless experience for you and your
customers." ("Seamless"? Words are interesting things...)
On
the plus side, there are expanding companies. Houston's First
Continental Mortgage Company is looking to aggressively grow
their retail origination channel by adding seasoned retail
originators, branches and company acquisitions. The company has
a strong builder presence across the Southeast, Southwest and
the state of Texas and is targeting retail expansion across this
lending footprint. Founded in 2002, it funded approximately $1
billion in 2011 and has Fannie Mae Seller/Servicer and Ginnie
Mae issuer approvals. FCM is financially strong, has significant
liquidity and consistently profitable. Visit www.fcmchou.com
for more information and contact Paul Peters, CMB at ppeters@fcmchou.com to
discuss opportunities.
On
the minus side, last week Grand Bank of NJ was
rumored to have been placed under some type of written order.
Written orders do not help mortgage subsidiaries of banks – in
this case ICON
Residential Mortgage, so we will see how this plays out.
On
the plus side, last month O2 Funding became part of
New Penn Financial, which is, in turn, a wholly owned
subsidiary of Shellpoint Partners (PA). New Penn is
licensed in 41 states and “Its affiliation with Shellpoint
Partners will allow New Penn to continue to originate Agency
loans while expanding its products to include Non-Agency loans”
– so thanks Shellpoint. (If you want more information contact
Omar Cantillo at ocantillo@newpennfinancial.com.)
On
the minus side, Friday the Georgia Department of Banking &
the FDIC shut down Global Commerce Bank – which starting today
will be Metro City Bank.
On
the plus side, we've become accustomed to the FDIC shuttering
banks on Friday afternoons. I can't say that every bank ever
shut down was under a written order of some type by regulators
leading up to its demise, but it would probably be a safe bet.
There are, of course, varying degrees of written orders issued
by state and federal bank regulators, but one notable success
story is that of HomeStreet
Bank’s recent successful IPO. Like many community banks,
HomeStreet ran into the 2008 buzz saw as construction lending
came to a grinding halt and builder defaults overwhelmed the
organization. Shortly thereafter, it was placed under a
regulatory order, which is fatal in the vast majority of such
situations – but in this case, under some new mortgage
leadership, its mortgage
division was so profitable (twice the average of its bank
peers, which are in turn twice as profitable as independent
mortgage banks on average) and well managed that the
regulators gave the bank some time to work out their troubled
loan portfolio. One industry vet believes that, “The
mortgage division kept the parent bank afloat until HomeStreet
was able to pull off an IPO two Fridays ago - I believe that it
is the only community bank that has been able to recapitalize
via the IPO route.” (For more information and the S-1, go to
EDGAR, HomeStreet, Inc., symbol HMST, Washington State. The FWP
is dated 2/8/12 and the entire S-1 under registration #
333-173980 and 333-179484 dated 02/14/12. The whole story is
contained on the first 16 pages.)
On
the interesting side, it seems Wells Fargo has
decided to expand globally: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/05/us-wellsfargo-expansion-idUSTRE82402K20120305.
Also
on the interesting side is that Banc Investment Daily reports
that in California “Kinecta
FCU and NuVision FCU announced their Boards had mutually
decided to terminate their merger agreement that would
have created a $4.4B credit union. The amount of time required
to get regulatory approval, integrate the companies and final
review were simply too onerous and too disruptive to their
members.”
And
lastly, I received this note: “I found your recent posts
regarding Provident’s decision to no longer accept low-rise
condos and limit hi-rise condos to a few specific markets
interesting. In particular, I’m referring to the statements that
Provident, because it offers such low rates, is looking to lower
its costs and improve their execution in the secondary market.
In contrast, InterBank
Mortgage, a direct seller who closed over $1 billion in
wholesale last month alone, continues to offer condos to its
brokers/bankers. (For information on getting approved with
InterBank contact Phil Grossfield at pgrossfield@interbankwholesale.com.)
Last
week the commentary mentioned issues with UCDP, and I received
this note: “The problem with the UCDP, supposedly, is the vendor
that FNMA and Freddie contracted with to build the technology
and converting .pdf’s to MISMO was counting on a solid revenue
stream. It appears, however, that most lenders are working with
vendors that are already providing the appraisals in a data
format that can easily be piped directly to the UCDP, obviating
the necessity to convert .pdfs. The rumor is that the original
vendor has lagged in the people and technology to have the UCDP
functioning as promised - even the registration process to the
portal, which was supposed to be a 2-3 day process, is dragging
on for weeks.” (Editor’s note – I have not verified this.)
Regarding
the
HUD suit against BofA over, among other things, requiring
certain information on disability income, Barbara Werth of Mortgage Training Today
observes, “I just did a case study on that for my class and the
main thing that was in dispute was not that they had to provide
proof of the three years, but that B of A required the doctors
to state the nature of the disability. They had to list the
actual medical condition and that is what caused the problem.
FNMA guidelines do require that the 3 years be documented, but
nowhere in the guidelines does it state that the nature of the
disability be disclosed or is required. B of A had a condition
on the loan approval that the actual disability be documented.”
For thoughts write to her at Barb@MortgageTrainingToday.com.
There is always plenty of blame to go around, and on the
agency’s role, or lack thereof, S.W. from Sovereign writes, "As
many of us who work or worked for the agencies know, another
interesting note on the GSE situation is that if one looks at
the book of business the GSE's own that was originated to their
own underwriting standards, it is still performing within
expectations (I haven't seen the actual numbers in about 10
months, but the difference was stark at that time). In order to
meet the affordable housing goals that Mike mentioned in your
commentary Friday, both agencies began buying private-label
subprime pools of loans and MBS that were issued by entities
whose underwriting standards and guidelines the GSE's didn't
know, didn't understand and couldn't control or influence. I'm
not suggesting that the GSE's be let entirely off of the hook,
but I am saying that the full picture that illustrates Mike's
points isn't revealed until one looks at the performance of the
GSE-originated books vs. the performance of the GSE-purchased
books. That's when the damage of the government Affordable
Housing Initiative mandate really reveals itself."
Here's
a nice write up on agency guarantee fees: http://www.fanniemae.com/portal/about-us/media/commentary/021612-salle.html.
By the way, for a more in-depth look at what the future role of
the agencies might be like, given the druthers of FHFA, go to