Here’s
a walk down Memory Lane. “From my point of view, if 80% of the
sub-prime borrowers are managing to make ends meet and make the
mortgage payments on time, then, shouldn’t we as a Nation, be
justifiably proud that we are dramatically increasing
homeownership opportunities for those who have been
traditionally left behind.” Excerpt from Angelo Mozilo, “The
American Dream of Homeownership: From Cliché to Mission.” (John
T. Dunlop Lecture sponsored by Harvard’s Joint Center for
Housing Studies, Washington, DC, February 4, 2003) Ah, the good
ol’ days.
Let’s
move a few things out of the way from the start. First, several
readers noted that the streamline changes, with the MIP cutoff
date of May 31, 2009 are for the endorsement of an FHA
loan, not the origination. Endorsements take several days
if not weeks to take place after an origination. (One note I
received said, “Case in point, I have a friend and past client
who I closed on his purchase loan on May 29, 2009, however his
loan was not endorsed for several days or weeks afterwards, and
I cannot therefore take advantage of this MIP drop for him.
This really stinks.”)
Second,
anyone
who has raised children know that there are certain cut-off dates,
whether they are for entering first grade, or little league, or
whatever. Some seem more arbitrary than others. I have not seen
an iron-clad reason on the cut-off dates, and the same question
was asked about the HARP program. Many homes purchased before
this date, and those that still have mortgages are underwater.
As mentioned yesterday, the FHA has backed a sizeable share of
mortgages since then, and those borrowers won’t be able to take
advantage of the reduced fees, which will limit the reach of
this program, and many have lower rates anyway. According to
estimates from CSFB, about two thirds of all FHA-backed 30-year
mortgages were originated after the cutoff date and therefore
wouldn’t be able to benefit from the reduced premium.
(Speaking
of
the HARP, Wells Fargo’s
wholesale channel announced that on Monday, March 12th
it is rolling out Freddie’s HARP 2.0 and on the 19th
it is rolling out Fannie’s HARP 2.0. Both will offer the
“unlimited” LTV/CLTV feature.)
Sometimes
it is important to
remember what a streamline refinance is, from an underwriting
perspective. The FHA streamline refinance program has been
around for quite a while and is designed to allow borrowers who
are current on their loans to “roll-down” their interest rate
with little effort. According to the HUD website, the basic
requirements are that it must be an existing FHA loan, the
mortgage must be current (one time 30-days late, if last three
payments made on time), the refinance must result in a lower
monthly P&I, and there is no cash back. In the majority of
cases government guidelines say that no new appraisal required
(the original loan price is used), no new credit review is
required, no verification of employment or income is required,
and no cash back is allowed. LO’s everywhere, however, know that
most lenders, and especially those actually servicing these
loans, have overlays in place.
The
“Tangible Net Benefit”
requirement states that for fixed-to-fixed streamline
refinances, a borrower must realize at least a 5% reduction in
monthly payments – that’s P&I and the mortgage insurance
premium (MIP). In December, the annual charges on loans with
terms longer than 15-years were increased by 10 basis points
(.1%) to 120-125 basis points which made the Tangible Net
Benefit requirement even harder to accomplish. The planned
reduction in both the upfront and annual MIP requirements for
borrowers that received a loan prior to June 2009 should
certainly help. (The upfront premium on eligible loans is .01%
and the annual premium is 0.55%.)
There
has been a lot of HUD & FHA news, but the agencies have not
been quiet. In Fannie
news, in an effort to relieve financial pressure on
homeowners and taxpayers, Fannie Mae will be modifying its
Lender-Placed Insurance requirements. Barriers for borrowers
wishing to cure their delinquencies will be lowered, which
should also increase transparency and encourage competition in
the LPI market. LPI comes into play if homeowners with
Fannie-mortgaged properties can’t provide proof of the necessary
hazard insurance. In these cases servicers will secure coverage,
the catch being that this costs far more than the kinds of
policies borrowers secure for themselves. Expensive LPI can
really throw a “spanner” in the works when it comes to
delinquent borrowers who want to avoid foreclosure, which
requires reimbursing the servicer for the full cost of the LPI
policy. If a borrower isn’t able to do that and defaults on
their mortgage payments, the financial burden falls on Fannie.
By inviting private insurance companies to compete for Fannie
LPI business, Fannie is looking to reduce these incidences by
increasing competition, which would lead to lower costs across
the board.
This June will see some changes to its grids. Lenders will be
required to employ three new buyup and buydown grids with
specific rations covering 15- and 30-year high LTV Refi Plus
deliveries, and the Refi Plus grid known as “30 YR RP GT 105”
will become “30 YR RP GT 105 LTE,” which translates to greater
than 105% LTV/less than or equal to 125% LTV. On fixed-rate and
hybrid ARM products, maximum guaranty fee buy-up will jump from
20 to 25 bps.
There are a couple of new offerings on the Fannie website, one
of which is the March UMDP Yardstick newsletter, which contains
information about the fast-approaching transition to the UCDP
and ULDD transition deadline of March 19th. An updated version
of PoolTalk disclosure tool for MBS is also available; MBS
disclosures have now been consolidated into one application for
greater ease of use. Clarification on Hardest-Hit Fund programs
is available at https://www.efanniemae.com/sf/guides/ssg/annltrs/pdf/2012/ll1202.pdf
and Fannie has designed a new job aid called “Fannie Mae
Modifications: Calculating the Monthly Housing Expense-to-Income
Ratio,” which should be somewhat self-explanatory: https://www.efanniemae.com/lc/sir/pdf/stdmodexpinc.pdf.
Nationstar
Mortgage is
in the news this week. First, its IPO price came in lower than
most had hoped (16.6 million shares at $14 each versus the
$17-19 expected). Still, the IPO raised about $233 million, much
of which goes to its owner Fortress Investment Group. The
company is servicing over 645,000 residential mortgage loans
worth $106.6 billion. Which leads to the next news item:
Nationstar and affiliate company Newcastle Investment Corp
agreed to acquire $63 billion in residential mortgage servicing
assets from Lehman Brothers subsidiary Aurora Bank FSB: http://www.bizjournals.com/dallas/news/2012/03/07/nationstar-to-buy-servicing-assets.html.
Turning
to the markets, investors had something to chew on – namely the
release of the recent prepayment (early pay-off) speeds from
existing pools of mortgages. Prepayment “speeds”
increased more than expected, mostly due to low mortgage
rates (although this is starting to wear off a little) and the
HARP. We’re also seeing the beginning of a rush by servicers to
close loans before the April 1 increase in guaranty-fees, as
well as, spare capacity at mortgage bankers as activity slowed
into the year-end holidays which allowed them to focus on the
credit impaired borrowers that take longer to process. By the
end of the day prices on 30-year MBS ended lower/worse by about
.125 and the U.S. 10-yr worsened about .250 in price to a yield
of 1.97%.
At
8:30 am, Initial Claims were released and projected unchanged at
351k but unemployment benefits actually rose to 362,000 last
week from an upwardly revised 354,000 the week prior. That about
does it for new, and in
the early going the 10-yr is at 2.00% and MBS prices are worse
by about .125
Abbott and Costello
COSTELLO: I want to talk about the unemployment rate in
America.
ABBOTT: Good Subject. Terrible times. It's 9%.
COSTELLO: That many people are out of work?
ABBOTT: No, that's 16%.
COSTELLO: You just said 9%.
ABBOTT: 9% Unemployed.
COSTELLO: Right 9% out of work.
ABBOTT: No, that's 16%.
COSTELLO: Okay, so it's 16% unemployed.
ABBOTT: No, that's 9%...
COSTELLO: Wait a minute. Is it 9% or 16%?
ABBOTT: 9% are unemployed. 16% are out of work.
COSTELLO: IF you are out of work you are unemployed.
ABBOTT: No, you can't count the "Out of Work" as the
unemployed. You have to look for work to be unemployed.
COSTELLO: BUT THEY ARE OUT OF WORK!
ABBOTT: No, you miss my point.
COSTELLO: What point?
ABBOTT: Someone who doesn't look for work can't be counted with
those who look for work. It wouldn't be fair.
COSTELLO: To whom?
ABBOTT: The unemployed.
COSTELLO: But they are ALL out of work.
ABBOTT: No, the unemployed are actively looking for work.
Those who are out of work stopped looking. They gave up. And,
if you give up, you are no longer in the ranks of the
unemployed.
COSTELLO: So if you're off the unemployment rolls that would
count as less unemployment?
ABBOTT: Unemployment would go down. Absolutely!
COSTELLO: The unemployment just goes down because you don't
look for work?
ABBOTT: Absolutely it goes down. That's how you get to 9%.
Otherwise it would be 16%. You don't want to read about 16%
unemployment do ya?
COSTELLO: That would be frightening.
ABBOTT: Absolutely.
COSTELLO: Wait, I got a question for you. That means there are
two ways to bring down the unemployment number?
ABBOTT: Two ways is correct.
COSTELLO: Unemployment can go down if someone gets a job?
ABBOTT: Correct.
COSTELLO: And unemployment can also go down if you stop looking
for a job?
ABBOTT: Bingo.
COSTELLO: So there are two ways to bring unemployment down, and
the easier of the two is to just stop looking for work.
ABBOTT: Now you're thinking like an economist.
COSTELLO: I don't even know what the heck I just said!
And now you know why the Administration's employment figures are
improving!
If
you're interested, visit my twice-a-month blog at the STRATMOR
Group web site located at