Jun. 22, 2012: Mortgages in Canada; of course the borrower is paying for higher lending costs - did our gov't think lenders would?
Rob Chrisman
Want
some good news? My grades did not qualify me for admittance to
Harvard (that is not the good news), but that institution put
out good research material that ispositive for
housing this year. Here is some on housing for 2012. If
you have ADD, like me, at least click on "Signs of a Turnaround
in the U.S. Housing Market: 2012 State of the Nation's Housing
Report Released" and peruse the Executive Summary: http://www.jchs.harvard.edu/.
It is great for presentations and for selling anyone interested
in investing in a mortgage bank or real estate firm.
Want
some different good news? Yesterday oil declined below
$80/barrel for the first time in about 8 months, and we
find the major commodity index down 22% from its peak earlier in
the year. So it should cost less to fill up that tank, or ge.t
that gold "grill" at the cosmetic dentist.
Angela Merkel arrives at the Passport Control at the Charles de
Gaulle airport.
"Nationality?" asks the immigration officer.
"German,"
she replies.
"Occupation?"
"No,
just here for a few days..."
World War II humor aside, do we want Greece, and Europe, to
overcome its current hurdles? Of course we do - but be careful
what you wish for, as stability in Europe would tend to move
our rates higher. (And they would, if it weren’t for the
fact that our economy is only limping along.) For example, this
trader's note came across Wednesday: "The 10-year yield is 4
basis points higher this morning at 1.66% on news that Greece
has formed a coalition government." Sure enough, Greece has
formed a coalition government of New Democracy, PASOK, and
Democratic Left, with Samaras to be the Prime Minister. I don't
know all the specifics, but the "Troika" is expected to disburse
within days the 1 billion euros from the March review that they
have been holding waiting for the election outcome, and this
should keep the government alive for about 1-2 months. If all
goes well, Greece should receive the next tranche by late July
or early August. However, the negotiations will be challenging,
as growth is well below the program projections, fiscal
consolidation is already off track, and reforms have been
delayed during the long pre-election period.
And in Canada, Europe is hitting hard: Finance Minister Jim
Flaherty and Mark Carney, the central bank governor, went public
in a joint campaign to head off runaway inflation in the
overheated housing sector. So the Harper government is trying to
offset the negative impact of the central bank’s pro-growth
low-interest rate policy by making it harder for Canadians
to take out mortgages. Flaherty said he acted to toughen
mortgage rules for the fourth time in six years to slow the
growth of a real estate bubble. He noted that the bursting of
the U.S. housing bubble caused long-term damage to the American
economy. He singled out the condominium market in Toronto as the
most troubling hot spot. Buyers should conduct themselves
prudently he said. “Some calming of the market is desirable.” The
government is tightening mortgages by reducing the maximum
amortization for a government-insured mortgage to 25 years from
30 years. It is also lowering the maximum amount Canadians can
borrow when refinancing a property to 80 per cent from 85 per
cent of the value of their homes. Flaherty has complained in the
past about people using their homes at ATM machines. And
government-backed mortgage insurance will no longer be available
for homes with a purchase price of more than $1 million.
The adage, "Don't put all your eggs in one basket" is being
carried out by the OCC and Dodd Frank. Evaluating and limiting
counterparty risk is a big deal, whether you're a mortgage
company, a bank, a vendor, or a Realtor, so although this update
applies to banks (a rule limiting the amount of lending exposure
financial institutions can have to a single counterparty), watch
for similar moves for everyone: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/20/us-financial-regulation-occ-idUSBRE85J0WQ20120620
The average loan to value ratio of closed loans broke through
80% in May, the highest level since Ellie Mae began
tracking these details in August of last year. The average LTV
was 81%, up from 80% in April and driven by an easing of LTVs on
conventional refinances. Before MI companies pop the champagne,
most believe that it is a sign that HARP 2.0 is helping
more borrowers. The LTV of both closed and denied loans has
risen steadily from 82% in August to 88% in May while debt to
income ratios (DTI) and FICO scores have remained relatively
unchanged. Many underwater borrowers have been attracted by the
rate changes in HARP but have not successfully refinanced.
Refinancing represented 54 percent of closed loans in May, down
2 percentage points from April. As might be expected, there
were substantial differences in the profiles of loans accepted
and denied by FHA and conventional lenders. What was surprising
was the additional leeway FHA lenders appear to grant to
purchasers over those refinancing.
I
received a distressing/distressed note from a “governmentally
aware” reader who was in a hearing yesterday with the CFPB.
It would seem that a lack of knowledge of how a mortgage is
originated, and how borrowers are helped by the mortgage
industry in general, is still a big stumbling block. “The CFPB
seems so out of control it is frightening. The brokers and
bankers were again in full agreement. For almost 30 years I
thought they would never agree on the color of the sun, but
watching the CFPB deflect answers has brought them together. One
person brought up that the issue was disclosures, and the CFPB
responded with confusing answers that made it seem it was more
concerned with deadlines than with doing what was right for
borrowers and the health of the housing market. January 21st
is looming! The CFPB seems to be micromanaging the issues from
LO comp that a company might pay a 175% year-end bonus if you
help engage in steering to what percentage can be placed into a
401k. Forget ERISA or the IRS – the CFPB spent more time
figuring out pat answers and deflection strategies than anything
else. It sounded like 100% of the feedback opposed the Flat Fee
and they have no alternative.”
The reader went on. “On one topic the CFPB claims unfettered
exemption authority while on another claiming extremely limited.
Then they claimed they had undertaken studies but when one
member asked what study, suddenly it was ‘life experience and
observations of human nature.’ Where is Barney Frank? He's the
only one smart enough who can fix this mess. Dodd is off with
his contributors in the motion picture industry. Barney broke
it, then he can fix it – the CFPB doesn’t seem to understand
every ‘hair brain’ idea is going to cost the consumer more.”
This
certainly leads right into the next topic, reported by the
Financial Times, that, “Most US homeowners are paying
above-market mortgage rates, new data show, indicating
that government efforts to spur refinancings have yet to fully
benefit households despite ultra-low headline borrowing costs.
‘Many Americans are able to take advantage of lower interest
rates. Many people have refinanced or bought homes,’ Ben
Bernanke, Federal Reserve chairman, said on Wednesday at a news
conference. But he added: ‘Mortgage access is much tighter than
it’s been in a long time.’ But figures from CoreLogic, a housing
data provider, show 20.5 million of 39 million creditworthy
“prime” borrowers are paying rates of more than 5% while just
5.7 million households are enjoying rates of less than 4%. The
data speak of a credit divide that the Fed and Barack Obama’s
administration have struggled to close despite numerous schemes
to enable borrowers to refinance into cheaper mortgages. That
gap is having an impact on consumer spending, which makes up
roughly 70 per cent of US economic activity, as a greater share
of borrowers’ cash than necessary is being spent on housing. The
impact is also being felt in the White House, where Barack Obama
faces a November election and has recently pushed Congress to
pass new legislation designed to further increase mortgage
refinancings. Experts argue that borrowers generally should be
refinancing when their mortgage rates are at least 1 per cent
higher than the market rate for a new home loan. In theory, more
than 20 million borrowers should be refinancing. But many of
these borrowers are ‘trapped’, according to Senator Robert
Menendez, who has introduced legislation to ease access to
refinancings for borrowers for whom the fall in house prices
have left them with insufficient equity to refinance.”
Those
in the biz know that one can chalk this up to borrower lethargy,
worries about losing a job, not wanting to pay the upfront
financing fees, the thought that rates will go lower. (Of
course, investors in the high coupon MBS’s, such as the Fed,
money managers, pension funds, and insurance companies, don’t
mind the feet dragging while they’re earning the high yields.)
But most “in the know” say that one big hindrance is the
uncertainty in the market place (will housing prices drop, will
I lose my job, how long it will it take to pay for the fees,
maybe I won’t qualify now,etc.).
And lenders are so worried about making a simple mistake,
which could result in a buyback years down the road, that the
cost of processing, underwriting, and verifying loans has
skyrocketed, in addition to the regulatory and compliance
costs that are heaped onto the borrower. The government didn’t
expect lenders to absorb those costs, did they?
The
Philly Fed collapsing in May to its lowest level since August,
and is consistent with a weak Empire State Survey in June and
soft Chicago PMI in May. Jobless claims decreased by 2,000 to
387,000 in the week ended June 16, as the four-week average
climbed to 386,250, the highest of the year. Existing Home Sales
dropped 1.5% to 4.55 million in May, but constrained by tight
supply, prices continue to gain. (Inventory slipped 0.4% to 2.49
million existing homes available for sale, which represents a
6.6-month supply at the current sales pace. Listed inventory is
20.4% below a year ago when there was a 9.1-month supply.)
Lastly on Thursday we learned that the Conference Board Leading
Indicator Economic Index increased 0.3% in May to 95.8, after a
decline of 0.1% in April, and a 0.2% increase in March.
After
all that, stocks took it on the chin Thursday. There are those
that believe money is a zero sum game, and every move in stocks
results in a corresponding opposite move in bonds. That is
incorrect, and although bond prices improved, they certainly
didn’t do so as much as equities sold off: the 10-yr improved by
only about .250 and closed at 1.61%. (Agency MBS prices improved
by less than .250.) Much of this was attributed to the reasons
above.
It
is still way too darned early to know where the markets are (I’m
catching a 5:45AM flight from Florida to California, hence the
early commentary). But the U.S. markets get a respite today
after a busy week of data and events as there are no economic
reports or important events scheduled. Perhaps an early start to
the weekend for the markets?
These are from a book called Disorder in the American Courts,
and are things people actually said in court, word for word,
taken down and now published by court reporters who had the
torment of staying calm while these exchanges were actually
taking place. (Part 2 of 3)
ATTORNEY: Were you present when your picture was taken?
WITNESS: Are you kidding me?
_________________________________________
ATTORNEY: So the date of conception (of the baby) was August
8th?
WITNESS: Yes.
ATTORNEY: And what were you doing at that time?
WITNESS: What do you think?
____________________________________________
ATTORNEY: She had three children, right?
WITNESS: Yes.
ATTORNEY: How many were boys?
WITNESS: None.
ATTORNEY: Were there any girls?
WITNESS: Your Honor, I think I need a different attorney. Can I
get a new attorney?
____________________________________________
ATTORNEY: How was your first marriage terminated?
WITNESS: By death.
ATTORNEY: And by whose death was it terminated?
WITNESS: Take a guess.
If
you're interested, visit my twice-a-month blog at the STRATMOR
Group web site located at www.stratmorgroup.com.
The current blog discusses the issue of the Freddie Mac &
Bank of America buybacks, and its potential impact on the
industry. If you have both the time and inclination, make a
comment on what I have written, or on other comments so that
folks can learn what's going on out there from the other
readers.