Jul. 14, 2012: Bastille Day thoughts on Wells, 4th party originations, agency caps, minimum net worth, and counter-party risk
Rob Chrisman
I
was very excited when my son came home the other day and said,
"I've decided what I want to do when I get out of school – I
am going to be a
building appearance technician!" I was pretty excited
about that until I realized that it meant he wanted to be a
janitor. After only six years of college! Yes, kids have a way
of becoming older. (By the way, kidding about my son, but not
about that fancy job title that I saw the other day.)
We’re all becoming older. Yesterday I listened to a
presentation from a health care professional from Cal
bemoaning the aging of workers in that industry, and this
commentary often discusses the apparent lack of youths in real
estate and mortgage banking. The Census Bureau tells us that
there was a small uptick in the nation’s median age, from 37.2
years in 2010 to 37.3 in 2011. The 65-and-older population
increased from 40.3 million to 41.4 million over the period
and included 5.7 million people 85 and older. Likewise,
working-age adults (age 18 to 64) saw their numbers rise by
about 2 million to 196.3 million in 2011. In contrast, the
number of children under 18, 74.0 million in 2011, declined by
about 200,000 over the period, largely because of the decline
in high school-age children 14 to 17. Maine had a higher
median age than any other state (43.2), with Utah having the
lowest median age (29.5). Florida had the highest
percentage of its population 65 and older (17.6%), followed by
Maine (16.3%). Utah had the highest percentage of its total
population younger than 5 (9.3%). Among counties, Sumter, FL,
was the nation’s “oldest,” with 45.5% of its population 65 and
older, and Geary, KS, was the nation’s “youngest” (11.4
percent younger than 5).
The
industry is buzzing, of course, over Wells Fargo’s decision to
exit its wholesale channel. As this commentary mentioned a few
days ago, this, along the compliance and regulatory
environment we’re in now, has the effect of solidifying the
position of those larger institutions already in the market. While
the government argues against “Too big to fail,” isn’t that
exactly what is happening now? Who is going to start a
mortgage brokerage or bank now? Is the first person you hire
the VP of production, or an on-staff attorney? There is
some chatter out there that the Wells move was done as a
protest against the state AG settlement details, and that the
courts may feel pressured to change it. I think that is
wishful thinking.
On
the correspondent side, Wells and other correspondents, can
continue to implement hurdles/raise the proverbial bar to the
point of excluding a large number of sellers rather than
eliminate the correspondent channel entirely. The rumor is out
there that Wells correspondent will raise the minimum net
worth to $25 million for lenders to sell loans to them. I view
this as unlikely, but the traditional "loan officer becomes a
loan broker, loan broker becomes a mortgage banker, and so on"
model is being ground down.
And
let’s not forget Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae also looking
at counterparty risk, and their “behind the scenes”
structuring of sales caps (possibly annual or moving) based on
a counterparty’s net worth. Even with agency approval, if a
mortgage bank’s net worth is $5 million, at 40x1 sales to a
particular agency caps at $200 million, and I know plenty of
mortgage banks with that kind of net worth doing $50 million
per month – does that mean by the summer of every year the
large aggregators see a big pick-up in business from
non-depository mortgage banks? Ah, to be a depository…even
smallish well-run banks have assets and net worth north of
$100 million – it is easy to see the agencies and aggregators
preferring them as counterparties.
“NAMB
does recognize and appreciates Wells Fargo’s strong support of
mortgage brokers in the past and in the future. Wells Fargo is
going to continue to do mortgages, only each loan will now go
through the correspondent channel and not directly from the
broker. ‘This should truly give the medium and large
wholesalers, especially the regional ones, a chance to expand
and grow, doing more business by picking up the volume that
were going through Wells Fargo in the first place.’”
Not
so fast. The Franklin Americans of the world will take in more
broker business and then send it to Wells? It is easy to see
how the large banks/servicers/aggregators might limit the type
of Correspondent business.
Here
is a note I received a while back: "Rob, I know that Chase
will not purchase third-party originations. But when do you
see large investors cutting back their purchases of '4th
party originations'? (Loans that were rejected by a
particular investor's retail channel, say Wells or Citi, and
then approved by a broker and then brokered to a small
regional lender, which then sells it to Wells or Citi through
delegated underwriting into the correspondent channel.)"
Put
another way, the street definition of "4th party" is when the
loan closes in the name of any other entity than who sells it
to the end seller/aggregator. So if I fund my loan with ABC
Mortgage, and then ABC sells the closed loan to Franklin
American, and then Franklin sells it to Citi, and then Citi
sells it to The Street... you get the idea. Of course, if the
lender, say Provident or Guild or Stearns, is putting the loan
into its own portfolio, then this issue is greatly reduced.
The
original issue which caused the loan to be rejected in the
first place may have been cured, or the initial decline may
not have been caused by a risk issue, but instead by a
system's issue - there are often differences in underwriting
guidelines, approval processes, and prices between retail,
wholesale, and correspondent channels at large
banks/investors. That being said, I have heard the
correspondents of the correspondents who engage in 4th party
originations are indeed under scrutiny for process,
procedure, and controls - correspondents are scrutinizing
their clients to a much greater degree.
Or, put another way, correspondent clients who are doing
correspondent business... This is yet another reason why many
lenders are going directly to the agencies – but what if/when
they’re capped based on net worth? Calgon, take me away…
On
to something simple like somewhat recent
investor/M&A/training/agency updates, providing a
flavor for the environment. They just don’t stop. As always,
it is best to read the actual bulletin.
The
Collingwood
Group is having its next complimentary
conference call with its Risk Management and Compliance
Division staff members (FHA and MRB experts). It will address
steps that lenders can take to be proactive, manage risk, and
avoid FHA and specifically Mortgagee Review Board sanctions.
In the third call in the series, Maximizing FHA Claim
Filing (Part A and B) will be the topic, focusing on the
FHA claims process and pitfalls: https://www.directeventreg.com/registration/event/99845500.
Beginning
on July 31st, Wells Fargo Funding will deliver Net
Funding notices by encrypted email instead of via fax.
Sellers should ensure that their internal processes support
the changes.
In light of the FHFA’s rule prohibiting the financing of
properties encumbered by a private transfer fee covenant that
doesn’t directly benefit the relevant property, Wells Funding
will only purchase loans with covenants that require payment
to mandatory HOAs, nonprofit organizations, and master and
sub-associations.
As of July 16th, all loan closed loan packages will be
required to include a fully completed Loan Submission
Summary. Loans whose packages do not include the LSS will be
suspended.
In response to Fannie’s decision to change various
construction-to-permanent financing requirements, Wells
Funding is updating its Prior Approval
construction-to-permanent policy such that only Rate/Term and
Cash-out refinances are permitted. In addition, Wells will
require that all construction-to-permanent transactions adhere
to the agencies’ requirements for LTV ratios. LTVs for
non-conforming loans will continue to be calculated using
Wells’ methodology, and the Wells Fargo Identity of Interest
requirements will still apply to both conforming and
non-conforming loans. These policy changes affect Best Effort
Registration, Best Effort Locks, and Mandatory Commitments
made on or after June 18, 2012.
Wells’ policy on qualifying loans with Mortgage Credit
Certificates has been revised as well, with the new policies
taking effect on July 16th. Delegated and Prior Approval
loans using eligible LP or DU responses will be subject to
Freddie’s and Fannie’s eligibility requirements,
respectively. Prior Approval Manually Underwritten loans will
be qualified by calculating the amount of subsidy established
in the MCC on a monthly basis and adding it to the borrower’s
income. Regarding documentation, all government and
conventional loan packages must include a copy of the MCC, a
copy of the W-4 and worksheet, and the MCC worksheet.
The Nevada Hardest Hit Fund was recently allocated $50,000,000
to reduce principal for borrowers refinancing under HARP. Be
aware that DU Refi Plus loans that use Hardest Hit Funds in
Nevada or any other state for the purposes of principal
reduction are not eligible for purchase by Wells Funding.
Beginning July 1st, Wells will start billing sellers a $25
initial DU case file fee for every file for which Wells Fargo
is identified as the sponsoring lender. The fee will be
waived once Wells has purchased the loan.
The state of Virginia has amended its recordation tax
requirements for refinance loans. As of July 1st, the
recordation tax levied upon refinance loans will be 18 cents
per $100 up to $10 million to the state and six cents per $100
to the city or county on the entire loan amount. This tax
should be disclosed on the GFE.
Citibank Correspondent has updated its credit overlays
document from the edition published in May to include LTV and
FICO score restrictions on condos in Georgia, a clarification
on the maximum CLTV for government loans, and “Properties
Listed for Sale” as an overlay for LP. In addition, the
phrasing “Interim Interest” was changed to “Per Diem
interest,” and a duplicate appraisal topic for government
loans was removed. The Ineligible Originator List, which
provides the names of all brokers, correspondents, and other
loan originators and parties that are prohibited from playing
a role in the origination of any loan submitted to Citi for
purchase, has been updated as well. The newest version of the
list is available on the Citi Correspondent site in the elfno
section.
Citi reminds clients that verbal verifications of employment
must be completed within 10 business days of the closing/note
date for conventional loans and 30 calendar days for
government loans. The VVOE documented in the file should
contain enough information to re-create the process used to
supply the necessary information. For borrowers with multiple
employers or second job income, multiple verifications are
required.
In response to rising operational costs, US Bank has
revised its commitment fees for Purchase Funded loans.
Commitment fees for FHA Delegated, USDA Delegated, VA
Delegated, FHA/VA Sponsorship, conventional loans underwritten
by either US Bank or delegated correspondents, and second
mortgage loans are all subject to increases ranging from $105
to $305. The increases will affect relevant loans that fund
on or after July 2nd.
Due to the recent fire activity in Colorado, Flagstar
is temporarily suspending funding for loans on properties in
certain zip codes. Properties in the Florida zip codes that
were hit by Tropical Storm Debby must be re-inspected before
Flagstar will issue a “Final Clear to Close” status. For a
full list of all the zip codes affected by these
announcements, contact Flagstar Underwriting.
With
regards to recent MERS changes, the Originating ORG ID
Exception will be used for transactions where the customer has
not provided their MERS ID, Flagstar generates the MIN number,
and the originator closes in their own name. This will be
protocol until July 5th. Clients should email brokerdelegatee@flagstar.com
with their ORG ID, confirmation, and Lender ID by this date at
the latest.
I had a little problem at Wal-Mart yesterday.
Apparently when the cashier said, “Strip down, facing me,”…she
was talking about my debit card.
If
you're interested, visit my twice-a-month blog at the STRATMOR
Group web site located at www.stratmorgroup.com.
The current blog discusses the issue of the Freddie Mac &
Bank of America buybacks, and its potential impact on the
industry. If you have both the time and inclination, make a
comment on what I have written, or on other comments so that
folks can learn what's going on out there from the other
readers.