Sep. 7, 2012: Romney housing plan; USDA community list; thoughts on 4th quarter mortgage profits; appreciation to defeat eminent domain?
Rob Chrisman
In
1970, Marian McQuade began a campaign to establish a day to
honor grandparents which finally paid off in 1978 when
President Jimmy Carter signed a federal proclamation approving
the first Sunday after Labor Day as National Grandparents Day.
Did you know that one out of ten children in the U.S. live
with their grandparents? That’s right – per the Census
Bureau there are seven million grandparents whose
grandchildren (younger than 18) living with them in 2010.
Unfortunately, per the Bureau, $45,000 is the median income
for families with grandparent householders responsible for
grandchildren under 18. Among these families, where a parent
of the grandchildren was not present, the median income was
$33,000.
Huh?
San Bernardino County might not need the eminent domain
tool, given recent price appreciation? That would be
good news indeed for the industry - here is the report on
property values: http://www.clearcapital.com/company/MarketReport.cfm?monthSeptember&year 12.
(For more information or to schedule a meeting to speak with
Dr. Villacorta who is responsible for it, please contact Faith
Murphy, Manager, Customer Development at Clear Capital, at faith.murphy@clearcapital.com.)
Are
low rates great for everyone? Maybe not. PIMCO’s Bill Gross is
warning the Fed’s actions to cut bond yields in the market to
stimulate lending could hurt banks over the longer term and
serve to contract lending. Mr. Gross has been wrong before
(who hasn’t?), but he worries borrowing costs are so cheap
that banks will stop making loans and be merged out
given the difficulty of making a reasonable return on their
capital if things go on too long.
Many
wonder
if the Republicans will abolish Dodd Frank
and, thus, the CFPB, if they win the White House in two
months. I doubt it, but here is a more educated view: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/wp/2012/08/30/what-would-a-gop-version-of-financial-reform-look-like/.
Up until recently, Romney had said little to illuminate his
views on the topic, except to say that when it comes to
foreclosures, the government should butt out. “Let it run its
course and hit the bottom,” Romney told the Las Vegas
Review-Journal last October, per Fox News. And since then, the
former Massachusetts governor has largely avoided references
to housing policy, except when criticizing President Barack
Obama’s. Romney’s 59-point economic growth plan contains no
housing initiatives. Among two dozen issues addressed on his
campaign website -- from taxes to trade policy -- foreclosures
are not mentioned. But a Romney housing plan of sorts has
been put forth, and here it is: http://www.mittromney.com/issues/housing.
It includes, "A Plan To End The Housing Crisis: ‘Responsibly
sell the 200,000 vacant foreclosed homes owned by the
government’, ‘Facilitate foreclosure alternatives for those
who cannot afford to pay their mortgage’, ‘Replace complex
rules with smart regulation to hold banks accountable’,
‘Restore a functioning marketplace and restart lending to
creditworthy borrowers’, and ‘Protect taxpayers from
additional risk in the future by reforming Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac’.”
Here
is a humorous note on current trends I received: “Hey Rob,
there are some ‘funny’ things going on right now. The rally in
MBS prices is due to the market believing that the Fed will
probably do a MBS purchase program to lower rates, yet another
agency - the FHFA announced that they are raising the g-fee s
another 10 bps, or 35-40 basis points in price. On the
political side, Obama’s campaign spent more than it brought in
last month – a deficit - is that a surprise? And here is a
political conundrum of the mortgage banker: Obama is going to
do everything in his power to refinance everyone on earth,
even renters, but it seems that Romney would like to do away
with Fannie & Freddie & HUD. So do we want to have the
wealth to distribute, or be taxed less on no money?”
NAR
is good at statistics: who, what, when, where, and how. And
now we have “how long?” Homes are spending less time on
the market as supply conditions tighten: the median time
(half above, half below) homes stayed listed was down about
30% to 69 days in July compared to 98 days in July 2011. While
the overall median is down, the report stated one in five
homes bought in July stayed on the market for at least six
months. (Like the two on either side of my house!) Per NAR, at
the current sales pace it would take 6.4 months to clear the
supply of homes available as of the end of July, a 31%
decrease from a year ago when there was a 9.3-month supply. Of
course, all real estate is local, and there are still areas
where houses just aren’t moving. But still, house prices are
not falling off of a cliff, which is sure to help investor’s
views of owning residential mortgages and MBS’s. In balanced
market conditions, NAR said it’s typical to see prices rise by
1 to 2 percentage points above the rate of inflation as
measured by the Consumer Price Index. Looking ahead, Yun said,
“Our current forecast is for the median existing home price to
rise 4.5 to 5 percent this year and about 5 percent in 2013,
which is somewhat stronger than historic norms because of the
inventory shortfall that is most pronounced in the low price
ranges.”
But
a person can buy a house using cash, or financing it. So will
purchases replace refi’s? And if they don’t, then what?
(Consultant Joe Garrett points out that consolidation in
residential mortgage banking is alive and well, and I agree: the
top five originators have funded 47% of all mortgages so far
this year, and the top 25 lenders represent 85% of all loans!
Although not totally applicable, there's that old saying that
in a consolidating industry, you either are the consolidator,
you sell to the consolidator, or you go out of business. “The
new factor in consolidation just might be compliance. We're
starting to hear from a few clients who are worried about the
CFPB and the cost of compliance and might be interested in
selling.”)
I
received this note: “Having been through many refi cycles, we
know that the end is generally not pretty as companies
adjust to the drop in volume. I think the end of this
one could be the ugliest I've seen in my 25 years in the biz
when - in the absence of a major purchase market bounce - we
could see volumes decline by 60-70% (or more) when we finally
run out of gas. Right now, all you have to do is own a home
and be making your payments to get a refi loan, but once the
refi train stops the feeling I have is that the fear of
regulatory and/or repurchase retribution will continue to
constrict lending for people who actually have to
qualify for a new purchase mortgage. Everyone that I know
feels that there are all kinds of eyes looking over their
shoulders and they don't want to be the ones who get thrown
under the bus for a loan that has any issues
later. Eventually, industry attrition will result in the fact
that there will be very few people who really know how to
make a credit decision. They've become nothing but
paperwork assemblers and AUS submission specialists. It's
like a friend of mine once said about auto repair
shops: ‘There are no more mechanics. They're all just 'parts
replacers'."
We
aren’t quite there yet, however, and I also received this note
from someone within one of the agencies addressing the recent
fantastic profit margins being seen in the industry. “I would
expect Q4 profits to be even higher. We saw a surge in the
primary-secondary pricing during in Q1, the benefits of which
we would have expected to see in Q2. The spread narrowed a
bit during Q2, so profit margins in Q3 could dip a bit as
well. However, the pricing spread rebounded to its highest
point of the year during Q3. This
could manifest itself in a great 4th quarter in loan sale
profitability. It appears that many lenders are
managing capacity through pricing.” I agree, although it seems
like volumes are slipping just a shade. And we're only in the
third quarter. The refi market's legs seem to be becoming a
little tired - just a sense. Of course, thousands of companies
and individuals are sure hoping this person is right.
And
for some reader input on house flipping, Dan Stone
expressed some views. “I think the Agencies and HUD have it
right, by allowing only owner occupant buyers 1st right to
purchase their foreclosed properties. I have seen too many
flippers supposedly upgrade a good home with cheap
improvements which benefit the short-term look of a home. A
couple years down the road, the outdoor lamps are tarnished,
the paint is chipping, the molding is separating from eaves,
the cheap carpeting is worn, etc. The flippers want to
maximize their financial gain, not install quality
improvements in the home. By allowing the owner occupant
buyers to upgrade when financially possible, I believe their
emphasis is on quality that will last during their time in the
house and longer, as they know they will be required to fix or
maintain any upgrades or changes.”
Yesterday, early on, Mario Draghi delivered his highly
anticipated speech and the big line was that the ECB is going
to launch "monetary outright transaction", in other words, the
ECB will be buying bonds of governments like Spain and
Italy, whose high yields are threatening their economic
recovery. This was not a big surprise; in fact, the net
effect after some of the details was a modest improvement from
the lows on bonds and a pullback from the pre-market highs in
stocks. Still, bonds sold off (don’t they like stability and
happiness in Europe?) and stocks rallied.
Continuing
with that news, there would be no quantitative limit to the
bond purchases - this means what it says, the ECB is not
putting in a limit like QE1 or QE2, but will instead purchase
"whatever it takes to save the Euro." The ECB will not be
printing money to purchase these bonds, but will sell other
assets to raise this money - therefore the ECB doesn't expand
its balance sheet or money supply and potentially stoke
inflation – Germany likes this. And the purchases will be
focused on the very short end of the yield curve, one to three
year maturities.
By
the time the dust settled, and after combining the Europe
chatter with decent jobless claims, ADP, and ISM numbers here,
our 10-yr yield closed at 1.68%. Agency MBS prices
fell/worsened about .375 on above-average sales volumes. But
geez – are rates really going to move that much before 2015?
The Fed is continuing to buy $1-1.5 billion per day – that
certainly helps the demand side of things (for now).
I’m
heading to the airport, so won’t be able to see the Non-Farm
Payroll numbers prior to sending out the commentary (they are
expected +125k), but in the early going the 10-yr is sitting
around unchanged as are MBS prices. Remember that not only do
we have the employment numbers, but also August prepayments
are reported late afternoon. And like payrolls warning, there
is some talk that speeds could be faster than expected – that
doesn’t help investor appetite. (Why would an investor buy an
asset for 105 one day only to have it pay off at 100 in two
months?)
The
following list of phrases and their definitions might help you
understand the mysterious languages of science and medicine.
These special phrases are also applicable to anyone working on
a Ph.D. dissertation or academic paper anywhere. (Part 2 of 3)
"In a series of cases" thrice.
"It is believed that" I think.
"It is generally believed that" A couple of others think so,
too.
"Correct within an order of magnitude" Wrong.
"According to statistical analysis" Rumor has it.
"A statistically oriented projection of the significance of
these findings" A wild guess.
If
you're interested, visit my twice-a-month blog at the STRATMOR
Group web site located at www.stratmorgroup.com.
The current blog discusses the new CFPB Rule combining TILA
& RESPA disclosures. If you have both the time and
inclination, make a comment on what I have written, or on
other comments so that folks can learn what's going on out
there from the other readers.