Oct. 6, 2012: Wall Street & underwriting guidelines; are u/w guidelines evolving? investor updates; classic Halloween humor
Rob Chrisman
How
fast does a year go? Fast. It was one year ago yesterday that
Steve Jobs died. The world lost a great visionary, but Apple
investors, although losing a great leader, and not crying too
much. Apple shares are now up roughly 76% since Jobs' death.
Investors know that Apple certainly can endure without him -
it certainly helps to have the talent still with the company
that he put in place.
No one likes being probed. Put that thought aside for a
moment, and think of the used car market (relevant since I
just sold my 2001 Prius with 179,000 miles on it - I have the
receipt for every service performed on the car, which I gave
to the buyer.) Buyers of mortgage-backed securities are
usually pretty smart folks - can't they analyze the
attributes of the pools they are buying? Or, if they did,
were they misled by the seller? That is the question at
the crux of a probe of Credit Suisse: federal and state
authorities are investigating Credit Suisse AG over
mortgage-backed securities packaged and sold by the bank. The
Justice Department and the New York Attorney General are among
those probing Credit Suisse's actions. It is the second bank
known to be targeted by U.S. authorities probing how banks
bundled mortgage loans into securities during the U.S. housing
boom. New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman filed a
civil fraud case against JPMorgan Chase & Co on Monday
over mortgage-backed securities originated and sold by Bear
Stearns. The lawsuit accuses Bear Stearns of a "systematic
abandonment of underwriting guidelines" and says that defects
among loans sold to investors were largely ignored. Creating
and packaging defective loans for sale to investors helped
cause the housing bubble and subsequent collapse. Here is the
story: http://www.foxbusiness.com/news/2012/10/04/credit-suisse-probed-by-us-over-mortgages-sources/.
Over
the past four years, it seems that everyone has been demanding
that something be done to “fix Wall Street,” and Dodd-Frank
and Occupy Wall Street, it would appear, have not been
sufficient. The Justice Department hasn’t actually
convicted any of the high-profile bankers who played a large
part in the financial crisis, and data from the IMF suggests
that the capital markets are no less vulnerable to crash and
fraud than they were in 2008. Despite aggressive
rhetoric from the White House, the Obama Administration has
opted to go after institutions rather than individuals. This
method has prompted criticism due to the fact that such
settlements don’t involve any actual admission of wrongdoing
and the dollar amounts they cost banks are really not all that
significant (take, for instance the $25 billion foreclosure
abuses settlement with Wells, Ally Financial, Citibank, BofA,
and Chase). There’s also the issue of time, money, and
expertise: it’s much more expensive and logistically difficult
to go after a plethora of individuals, and in the post-9/11
era, the FBI and Justice Department have been focused mainly
on counterterrorism (a whole other can of worms). In
addition, insiders cite pure and simple fear of financial
institutions failing if they were indicted and the resulting
effects on the already-precarious global markets.
Wall
Street often points to lenders offering lax guidelines, or not
underwriting loans to published criteria. There is some
argument there. But in the halcyon days of pre-2007, it was
possible to be given a mortgage loan with little more than a
credit score, no verification of income or assets required.
To make a gross understatement, things have changed since
then, and many borrowers are having difficulty qualifying for
loans due to “hyper-strict” nature of lenders’ underwriting
standards. With 30-year mortgage rates at historic lows, some
are hopeful that banks might be relaxing those standards, but
industry data actually points in the other direction. The
average credit score on new loans closed in August 2012 was
750, nine points higher than August 2011. When analyzing a
sample from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which dominate the
conventional loan market, the average score is 763, a point
higher than it was a year ago. For reference, less than 22%
of consumers have credit scores over 749. A sizeable chunk of
the population are therefore unlikely to qualify for a
mortgage should they want to purchase a home, long touted as
part of the American Dream.
Data
on down payments reflects a trend towards tighter requirements
as well. Back in 2005, the median down payment percentage for
American borrowers was a mere 2%, and 43% of borrowers put
down nothing at all. Compare this to the most recent numbers
from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac borrowers, who on average put
down 21% and had clean debt-to-income ratios. The actual time
it takes to process a mortgage loan has also increased—the
more checks in place, after all, the more time it takes to
review them. Underwriters doing 6-8 loans per day have into
auditors doing 2-3 files per day. From August 2011 to August
2012, the average time it took a loan to close from its
application date increased from 40 to 49 days. The time it
took to process a refinance increased from 37 to 51 days.
Indeed, frustrated would-be buyers are saying, but when will
lenders start to loosen their standards? Eventually, lenders
will probably relax a bit about potential regulatory
requirements, have fewer fears about expensive “buyback”
demands from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and remove some of
the fees associated with extra credit risk. For the time
being, however, don’t count on anything.
With
that in mind, let’s discuss some recent agency, investor,
and lender bulletins. These will give you a flavor for
what is going on out there, but it best to read the full
bulletin for all the sordid details.
In
the wake of the implementation of the new Uniform Appraisal
Dataset standards, Fannie Mae has published a UAD resource
document to provide users with additional guidance on
PDF extraction, updates on financing concessions for
comparables, and upcoming edits on the UAD page of its website
(https://www.efanniemae.com/sf/lqi/umdp/uad/index.jsp).
The Loan Delivery and upcoming UCDP release notes for October
have also been published on www.efanniemae.com, as
have the release notes for EarlyCheck 2.1, which will be
implemented on November 17th.
Wells Fargo Correspondent has announced that an
Expanded Approval recommendation of EA-I, EA-II, or EA-III
from Desktop Underwriter is now eligible for purchases on DU
Refi Plus refinances of a Wells-serviced loan. This applies
to Mandatory Commitments and Best Effort registration, locks,
and relocks dated August 20, 2012 and after.
Guidance on private transfer fee covenant for non-conforming
loans has been expanded such that Wells will no longer accept
loans that secure properties encumbered by a covenant
requiring payment to an organization that does not directly
benefit the property on which it is assessed. Properties
encumbered by fees for mandatory HOAs, master and
sub-associations, and nonprofit organizations as defined in
the Internal Revenue Code (certain educational, recreational,
environmental, and conservation activities or situations where
proceeds go towards the property’s maintenance, improvement,
and administration), however, are eligible. This applies to
all non-conforming loans regardless of when the covenant was
created.
Wells has provided additional guidance on bankruptcy and
insolvency in situations where the mortgagor was a debtor in a
state or federal proceeding where the loan debt was refinanced
and then reaffirmed during the proceedings.
In order to align with FHA policy, Citibank is
discontinued DU and LP as eligible process types for FHA
Credit Qualifying Streamline Refinances. All FHA Streamline
refinances are required to be “decisioned” manually as per HUD
guidance.
Citi has updated guidance on verbal employment verification to
state that, in cases where a borrower’s employer will not
verbally verify employment, a written verification or
verification from a reputable third party will suffice so long
as it is obtained within the same time frame.
Fifth Third reminded clients that First Payment Letters
must contain the seller’s information and that at the time of
closing, it doesn’t own the loan, which means that the first
payment information cannot be Fifth Third Mortgage Company.
Once the loan has been sold to Fifth Third, the seller is
required to complete a RESPA-compliant Good Bye Letter
indicating the new servicer of record and forward it to the
borrower. A copy of the First Payment letter should be
included in the loan file.
All Fifth Third borrowers must be provided with a Good Bye
Letter, which is required to include the effective date of
transfer; name, date, and phone number of transferor and
transferee; dates when the payment is due and when the current
servicer will no longer accept payments; any pertinent
information regarding the transfer’s impact on the insurance
coverage; a statement that assignment, sale, or transfer will
not affect the terms of the loan; and HUD model form including
information on late fees, rights upon making a “qualified
written request,” and the consumer’s right to damages for
violations.
Fifth Third also reminded clients that the GFE and HUD-1 for
VA loans must disclose the VA tax service fee, which ensures
compliance with RESPA and reduces potential tolerance cures.
Effective for all loan applications received on or after
September 17th, Fifth Third is allocating loans to its
approved MI partners based on the application’s final two
digits. This ensures that loans are evenly distributed
amongst MGIC, Essent, Radian, and Genworth and reduces
counterparty risk.
As a result of the g-fee increase, all Fannie and Freddie
fixed-rate and ARM loans locked by US Bank before
September 12th will be subject to additional extension fees if
they don’t fund by October 22nd. Loans with 20-, 25-, and
30-year terms will incur the current lock extension fee plus
50bps, while those with terms of 15 years or less will incur
the current fee plus 20 bps.
US Bank has clarified guidance to state that FHA-to-FHA
refinance transactions will be allowed provided that the loan
file meets the FHA’s definition of a Regular Credit Qualifying
Refinance with an appraisal. Registration or locks for FHA
Streamline refinances that are not refinances of existing US
Bank FHA loans will not be accepted.
Okay,
that’s enough for today!
A couple was invited to a swanky costume party.
Unfortunately, the wife came down with a terrible headache and
told her husband to go to the party alone.
He being a devoted husband protested, but she argued and said
she was going to take some aspirin and go to bed and there was
no need for his good time being spoiled by not going.
So he took his costume and away he went.
The wife, after sleeping soundly for about an hour, awakened
without pain and, as it was still early enough, decided to go
the party.
Since her husband did not know what her costume was, she
thought she would have some fun by watching her husband to see
how he acted when she was not with him.
She joined the party and soon spotted her husband cavorting
around on the dance floor, dancing with every nice woman he
could, and copping a little touch here and a little kiss
there.
His wife sidled up to him and being a rather seductive babe
herself, he left his current partner high and dry and devoted
his time to the new babe that had just arrived. She let him go
as far as he wished. (Naturally, since he was her husband!)
Finally, he whispered a little proposition in her ear and she
agreed. So off they went to one of the cars and had a quickie.
Just before unmasking at midnight, she slipped away, went
home, put the costume away and got into bed, wondering what
kind of explanation he would make for his behavior.
She was sitting up reading when he came in, and she asked what
kind of a time he had.
He said: "Oh, the same old thing. You know I never have a good
time when you're not there."
"Did you dance much?"
"You know, I never even danced one dance. When I got there, I
met Pete, Bill Browning and some other guys, so we went into
the den and played poker all evening. But you're not going to
believe what happened to the guy I lent my costume to...."
If
you're interested, visit my twice-a-month blog at the STRATMOR
Group web site located at www.stratmorgroup.com.
The current blog discusses the looming fiscal cliff brought on
by Washington DC. If you have both the time and
inclination, make a comment on what I have written, or on
other comments so that folks can learn what's going on out
there from the other readers.