Nov. 26, 2012: CFPB exam findings; thoughts on the CFPB & Dodd Frank determining underwriting; will PMI emerge from bankruptcy?
Rob Chrisman
Even
if you had to have the borrower come back to resign a
document, or you had to eat a one day extension, or locked a
loan under the wrong program, it isn't as bad as this: http://biggeekdad.com/2012/11/bad-day-for-trucker/.
I
am often asked, "Have you seen any CFPB exam results?
Have any fines been leveled? Are the mortgage companies that
have been audited, such as Stearns or Guild, under some type
of secrecy order?" Well, just like the results of your IRS
audit, or an FDIC exam of a bank, to the best of my knowledge
the results are not made public, but here is information
that will help regarding CFPB findings and fines: http://files.consumerfinance.gov/f/201210_cfpb_supervisory-highlights-fall-2012.pdf.
I
received this opinion note regarding the CFPB from an
originator in the Rocky Mountain States. “I have been
following the CFPB with a fair amount of attention as I am
very concerned about the continuing CFPB actions as I believe
that they constrain commerce through their massive regulatory
net. It is easy to characterize industry concerns as being
self-serving and ‘the same old bank complaints.’ However, as a
person with 40 years in the real estate financing world, I
have had many folks from both the residential and commercial
banking sectors say that in the absence of clear,
reasonable, and well defined regulations, everyone is
sitting tight and therefore greatly limiting their lending
so as not to run afoul of the regulators. The so the
result is that good, qualified borrowers are not able to build
their businesses or refinance to lower interest rates that
frees up capital to get our economy going again. As examples,
recent residential refinance we commenced for a couple ran 46
pages of disclosures before the file even went to compliance
for review. Most residential refinances now run 64 days from
application to closing!”
The
note went on. “I cite a number of appalling CFPB issues per
recent Wall Street Journal articles: (1) The CFPB has NO
oversight body that it has to report to. Neither Congress nor
the Fed (who ostensibly is supposed to fund its operations)
has any oversight rights, nor does the Administration. (2) The
CFPB can draw at will (and has and then some) 10% of the Fed’s
annual budget. (3) The CFPB can fine any institution (B of A
paid $39.4 BILLION in fines and buy backs the year ending
7/31/12 to various government entities and then was sued for
another $1 billion two months later) without any oversight or
consideration of the consequence to the institutions or the
economy. [Editor’s note: the fines did not come from the
CFPB.] As such, the CFPB and FHFA have an unlimited budget
through fines and Fed draws, with no oversight! Is there
another Federal institution, outside of the Federal Reserve
and the US Supreme Court that has such powers and lack of
oversight as the CFPB? There is no question that there were
gross abuses (just read Michael Lewis’ “The Big Short”) but
the industry has largely self-corrected (most 5 to 6 years
ago). Today the US consumer and our economy are now paying the
price for the indiscriminate actions of a new federal agency
that accounts to no one.”
I
also received this note, indicative of some of the confusion
out there, along with the depth that the government appears to
be entering the business of making a home loan. "Do the
regulators want the credit underwriting and the appraisal
underwriting functions to be separated? If yes, do they want
the appraisal underwriters to report into the corporate
umbrella instead of the line of business? There seems to be a
lot of confusion surrounding this. A number of Banks have
separated the appraisal and credit underwriting functions.
This comes with its own set of challenges since the two
functions are so closely integrated. Now there seems to be a
move afoot that Bank's audit/compliance departments do not
want the appraisal underwriters reporting into Mortgage
Operations. I disagree strongly as I think an appraisal
underwriter needs line of business expertise. What are you
hearing?" (I have not, but if you have any thoughts that can
be passed along, please feel free.)
The
industry expects news from the CFPB very soon on QM
(Qualified Mortgages) and QRM rules, and most believe that
they will not be onerous when it comes to LTV, DTI, “skin in
the game,” and so on. But there is still uncertainty,
and I received this opinion: “Unfortunately, we are stuck with
the QM rule, so how best to proceed? Determining a borrower's
capacity to repay (one of the three C's of underwriting, in
addition to creditworthiness and collateral) involves a number
of assessments including factors such as the number of months'
reserves of liquid assets, and the income left over after
debts and other expenses have been paid. Such factors need to
be weighed against one another, as well as against others
reflecting credit and collateral. It is the entire borrower's
risk profile that ultimately determines whether a loan will
default or not, not simply the ability to repay. The CFPB
ought to look at the automated underwriting scorecards used by
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Housing Administration
as a basis for developing an industry QM scorecard that weighs
all relevant borrower risk factors in place of a few simple
rules such as maximum DTI. The CFPB could instruct lenders to
manually override the model in cases where one risk factor was
simply too great (a debt-to-income ratio of 55% would be
worrisome no matter how high the same applicant's down payment
or credit score, for example). Importantly, the spreadsheet of
scenarios would be transparent to the entire market, so there
would be no doubt as to whether any loan fit the QM criteria.
While such an approach would not reduce the problem of the QM
definition restricting credit availability, it would provide
greater underwriting flexibility than a handful of
capacity-to-repay factors and at least create a rule more in
line with prudent practices that had been in place for years
before the boom. Regardless of the outcome, Dodd-Frank did
the industry and borrowers no favors in prescribing how
mortgages should be underwritten.”
Time
to look at some recent lender, MI, and agency updates
to give us a flavor for the policy and procedure trends. For
full details, read the full bulletin.
Effective
for all conventional loans approved on or after November 6th,
Clearpoint Funding has revised guidelines on MGIC and
Genworth mortgage insurance, foreign income, employment leave,
delayed financing, the removal of cash-out refinances from the
market prior to application, subordinate financing, multiple
mortgages, ineligible condo projects, rental income on
investment properties, transferred appraisals, limits on high
balance and ARM products, verification of employment for
self-employed borrowers, escrow transfers, and mineral
rights. There have been several updates to documentation
requirements and to government programs as well; see the full
Lending Guide (accessible via http://www.clearpointfunding.com/LGAArchives.aspx)
for complete details. Clearpoint Funding is now permitting
conventional fixed loans on 2-unit primary residence
properties with LTVs of up to 85% and FICOs of more than 660.
US Mortgage Corp has rolled out a new HARP 2.0 product
featuring unlimited CLTVs, LTVs over 105%, high debt ratios,
and eligibility based on LP and DU findings.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have announced that they
will be implementing new requirements that will hold servicers
responsible for choosing and maintaining communication with
law firms to handle their default-related legal services,
which includes foreclosures, loss mitigation, and bankruptcy
litigation. As per the FHFA’s October 2011 decision, this
will align the GSEs’ policies and will affect all new
referrals after June 1, 2013. The existing requirements of
the Designated Counsel Program, which will be referred to as
“Legacy Matters,” remain in effect until then, and servicers
dealing with default-related legal matters are permitted to
stay with their current firms until they’re resolved.
Several sections of the Fannie Selling Guide have been
amended, including those on reserves, loan redelivery, premium
recapture, pool purchase contracts, the financing of real
estate taxes pertaining to refinances, depository accounts,
delayed financing, outstanding collections, HUD-1 signature
requirements, and ownership of loans prior to purchase or
securitization. DU Refi Plus and Refi Plus guidance has also
been updated to reflect changes to the eligibility
requirements for mortgages with investor-paid primary or pool
mortgage insurance.
Fannie has launched its new business-to-business web portal,
which marks the demise of www.efanniemae.com.
All bookmarked content will lead users to the portal.
Both Fannie and Freddie are making certain concessions in a
bid to help out those homeowners that have been affected by
Hurricane Sandy. To speed the completion of mortgage loans
being processed, Fannie is temporarily loosening up
underwriting requirements for impacted borrowers and accepting
documents and maintaining pricing that was in place at the
time of the storm. Underwriting and property valuation
documents are also valid for 180 days in affected areas. In
addition, Fannie is authorizing servicers to extend
forbearance for up to 12 months, provide loan modifications
once borrowers are able to resume their monthly payments,
waive any late payment charges, temporarily suspend credit
reporting for borrowers receiving disaster relief, and delay
the initiation of foreclosure action.
Fortunately,
through all of this, home loan rates are behaving
themselves. Heck, with the Fed buying as much as they
are every day, why wouldn’t they? Wednesday and Friday saw
basically unchanged markets, so volatility has dropped, and
every Capital Markets guy likes that. And any LO who didn’t
lock last week, and is locking today or tomorrow, is happy
they didn’t lose 3-4 days of processing time when it takes so
long to close a loan anyway.
This
week brings a 2-yr, 5-yr, and 7-yr Treasury auction. For some
reason we escaped the release of any scheduled economic news
today (and none last Thursday or Friday), but the rest of the
week makes up for it. Tomorrow we have Durable Goods, the
Case-Shiller 20-city index, Consumer Confidence, and yet
another house price index (FHFA). Wednesday is more housing
news (New Home Sales) and the release of the Fed's Beige Book.
Thursday we have Jobless Claims, GDP (2nd look at
the third quarter), and more housing news (Pending Home
Sales). Lastly, on Friday we have Personal Income and
Consumption, some PCE numbers, and the Chicago Purchasing
Manager's survey. The 10-yr T-note closed Friday at a
yield of 1.69%, and this morning is at 1.67% and MBS prices
are perhaps .125 better in price than last week.
(I
know that this is a repeat, but still rings true.)
The governor from California is jogging with his dog along a
nature trail. A coyote jumps out and attacks the governor’s
dog, then bites the governor. The governor starts to
intervene, but then reflects upon the movie “Bambi” and
realizes he should stop because the coyote is only doing what
is natural.
He calls animal control. Animal control captures the coyote
and bills the state $200 for testing it for diseases and $500
for relocating it. He calls a veterinarian. The vet collects
the dead dog and bills the state $200 for testing it for
diseases. The governor goes to the hospital and spends $3,500
getting checked for diseases from the coyote and getting his
bite wound bandaged.
The running trail gets shut down for six months while the
California Fish and Game Department conducts a $100,000 survey
to make sure the area is now free of dangerous animals. The
governor spends $50,000 in state funds implementing a “Coyote
Awareness Program” for residents of the area. The Legislature
spends $2 million to study how to better treat rabies and how
to permanently eradicate the disease throughout the world.
The governor’s security agent is fired for not stopping the
attack. The state spends $150,000 to hire and train a new
agent with additional special training, re: the nature of
coyotes. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA)
protests the coyote’s relocation and files a $5 million suit
against the state.
Whereas…The governor of Texas is jogging with his dog along a
nature trail. A coyote jumps out and tries to attack him and
his dog. The governor shoots the coyote with his state-issued
pistol and keeps jogging.
The governor spent 50 cents on a .380-caliber, hollow-point
cartridge. Buzzards ate the dead coyote.
And that, my friends, is why California is broke and Texas is
not.
If
you're interested, visit my twice-a-month blog at the STRATMOR
Group web site located at www.stratmorgroup.com.
The current blog discusses some of the considerations facing
the FHFA regarding Fannie and Freddie. If you have both the
time and inclination, make a comment on what I have written,
or on other comments so that folks can learn what's going on
out there from the other readers.